🖐 The Check Up #15: Amazon Prime Exclusive Games & How Stupid the Idea is - YouTube

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🍒

Filter:
Sort:
JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

This is a list of games for the Xbox video game console.. Games. There are a total of 1047 titles on this list. See Lists of video games for other platform lists.. For a chronological list, click the sort button in any of the available regions's column.


Enjoy!
Are console exclusives a good thing or a bad thing? : truegaming
Valid for casinos
Club Exclusive — Pogo Insider
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
What will happen if they follow MS route and delve into the cross-buy thing?
I wont go to PC because I don't like playing on PC.
I have several, I just have no desire to buy games for them.
I don't care if games are exclusive or multiplat.
That is simply not relevant to me.
I decide which games I like and buy the console that plays them the best or have the exclusive games are stupid features or controller.
It's really quite simple.
People as in people who don't care about internet narratives?
They buy consoles because they are foremost video game playing machines and allow easy access to a new generation of video games.
That's why people buy them.
Well, you do get a console for it´s exclusives, you can only play Halo in Xbox or God of War in PS whatever or some version of Mario in any of the multiple Nintendo systems, once you have acquired the exclusives you want it finally doesn´t matter much what you have playing for example COD in either it´s pretty much the same one or the other.
Nopemost of people who buy consoles are casual gamers and they hardly care about exclusivesthose stupid fanboys who won't quit bashing phil spencer may disagree but they don't represent whole console gaming community as much as I don't represent the whole PC gaming community commonfate: same, out of circle of friends in two cities I've lived in the past 5 years, pc gamers are s minority Eh, I don't really want console exclusives.
Stuff like Uncharted represents the least interesting, least compelling kind of game design for me.
Boring stories, boring gameplay, it's lowest common denominator kind of stuff.
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
Nope, majority buy systems that will have their favorite games and friends on it.
Just look at top selling games and youll find why they buy the system.
visit web page notice exclusives wont be high on that list.
Eh, I don't really want console exclusives.
Stuff like Uncharted represents the least interesting, least compelling kind of game design for me.
Boring stories, boring gameplay, it's lowest common denominator kind of stuff.
TC wasn't talking only about SonyNintendo has an archive of great exclusive titles that I'd buy in heartbeat if they come to PC Defintely not.
It's a secondary factor.
My gaming friends made the switch to PC, which is convenient for me.
About everyone, friends and family has a Wii-U even if they barely use it, fortunately it had the added bonuses of exclusives I am somewhat interested in, so that's what I currently own.
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
For me too, since our main platform is PC and we have everything we want.
Well, then ppl should have no problem with exclusives being released on PC yet see how they went nuts over QB and i'm sure the worse would've happened if it was a Sony exclusive.
I don't think so, there is a huge demographic of people who simply just want something to play games on, something relatively cheap, and something that requires little thought to set up.
These are also likely click to see more reason why console games see huge sales but only in very few games.
This huge group that buys a console for 4-5 games a year at most, and of those games there rarely seem to be an exclusive.
Not saying that most people in these forums are that type, I mean since they are in here they care somewhat about games and gaming.
But most people I know that has a console, falls into that category.
Back in earlier generations, I'd say absolutely for me.
I bought my first PS1 specifically because of Bushido Blade, which was never going to come to PC.
Later, I got into FF7, FF8 and a bunch of other fun JRPGs that at the time were console exclusive.
Ever since, I purchased every new console under the assumption that there'd be at least -something- on those platforms that I'd like to play and so far I haven't been disappointed.
That said, if there's a PC version as well that's not released significantly after the console version then I'll go for the PC version every time because I have a beefy PC and unless the PC version is a really bad port it will generally always be better with faster loading times, better frame rates and resolutions, etc.
These days, though, there are more incentives for people to go console.
The online communities I know plenty of people who's purchasing decision was based on that platform all their friends where playing onthe online store features like free games with PSN+ and Xbox Live Gold, etc.
That's assuming that people are even entertaining the idea of getting a gaming PC, which many console owners don't.
Sure, on a gaming forum you'll see a ton of people comparing the merits of each but end of the day tons of console gamers aren't weighing the pros and cons of PC gaming versus consoles, they are thinking "I want to play some cool games.
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
For me too, since our main platform is PC and built casinos indian reservations why on are have everything we want.
Well, see more ppl should have no problem with exclusives being released on PC yet see how they went nuts over QB and i'm sure the worse would've happened if it was a Sony exclusive.
Agreed, I don't see what the big deal is.
Some people just hate it when an "opposing faction" gets a game they were getting as an exclusive and throw a hissy fit.
They can't see that MS is trying to support both PC and Xbox.
Something they should've always done.
It's always better for a company to go for multiple markets instead of one.
Anyway, I never cry when PC loses an exclusive.
The more gamers that get to play something, the better.
Only PC gamers buy consoles for exclusives.
Most console gamers are casuals they don't know anything about PC gaming For me?
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the blackjack sites that are online and free multiplayer 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
For me too, since our main platform is PC and we have everything we want.
Well, then ppl should have no problem with exclusives being released on PC yet see how they went nuts over QB and i'm sure the worse would've happened if show games that are free to play was a Sony exclusive.
Agreed, I don't see what the big deal is.
Some people just hate it when an "opposing faction" gets a game they were getting as an exclusive and throw a hissy fit.
They can't see that MS is trying to support both PC and Xbox.
Something they should've always done.
It's always better for a company to go for multiple markets instead of one.
Anyway, I never cry when PC loses an exclusive.
The more gamers that get to play something, the better.
Yeah, i've never seen a PC gamer bitching about an exclusive being released on PC.
Back in earlier generations, I'd say absolutely for me.
I bought my first PS1 specifically because of Bushido Blade, which was never going to come to PC.
Later, I got into FF7, FF8 and a bunch of other fun JRPGs that at the time were console exclusive.
Ever since, I purchased every new console under the assumption that there'd be at least -something- on those platforms that I'd like to play and so far I haven't been disappointed.
That said, if there's a PC version as well that's not released significantly after the console version then I'll go for the PC version every time because I have a beefy PC and unless the PC version is a really bad port it will generally always be better with faster loading times, better frame rates and resolutions, etc.
These days, though, there are more incentives for people to go console.
The online communities I know plenty of exclusive games are stupid who's purchasing decision was based on that platform all their friends where playing onthe online store features like free games with PSN+ and Xbox Live Gold, etc.
That's assuming that people are even entertaining the idea of getting a gaming PC, which many console owners don't.
Sure, on a gaming forum you'll see a ton of people comparing the merits of each but end of the day tons of console gamers aren't weighing the pros and cons of PC gaming versus consoles, they are thinking "I want to play some cool games.
No one person can answer that for everybody, for me no I don't buy a console just for it's exclusive but I"m sure some do.
Although, i would like a console to play smash bros, and mario kart with my girlfriend, fifa, and other couch co op games.
Yesh I know you can connect your pc to your living room tv.
Why waste money on rigging a pc when consoles are cheaper and more accessible?
Does it make PC bad?
We're just more comfortable playing on consoles.
Exclusives are the main reason PC gamers buy consoles for sure.
However, I'm pretty sure the majority of console buyers are there for the multiplats, and lack the budget or familiarity for using a gaming PC.
I have several, I just have no desire to buy games for them.
I don't care if games are exclusive or multiplat.
That is simply not relevant to me.
I decide which games I like and buy the console that plays them the best or have the preferred features or controller.
It's really quite simple.
Nopemost of people who buy consoles are casual gamers and they hardly care about exclusivesthose stupid fanboys who won't quit bashing phil spencer may disagree but they don't represent whole console gaming community as much as I exclusive games are stupid represent the whole PC gaming community Most ignorant post I've read here today.
I wont go to PC because I don't like playing on PC.
I have several, I just have no desire to buy games for them.
I don't care if games are exclusive or multiplat.
That is simply click at this page relevant to me.
I decide which games I like and buy the console that plays them the best or have the preferred features or controller.
It's really quite simple.
I don't game on consoles because of the exclusives.
I game on consoles because that's how I prefer to play.
I like lying on my bed and looking up at my big screen TV with controller in hand and headphones on.
If Halo started releasing on PC, it wouldn't make me want to start gaming on PC instead.
Nopemost of people who buy consoles are casual gamers and they hardly care about exclusivesthose stupid fanboys who won't quit bashing phil spencer may disagree but they don't represent whole console gaming community as much as I don't represent the whole PC gaming community Most ignorant post I've read here today.
K Yes main reason I went with xbox one was because of its exclusives and console exclusives it has.
If I just did multiplats then I'd probably go with a ps4.
Exclusives are the main reason that existing PC gamers buy consoles, but it is not the reason that most console gamers choose consoles over PC.
Some PC gamers seem to have a hard time accepting this, but the reality is, a lot of people just simply do not like playing games on a PC.
Phil Spencer said it perfectly when he said that people play on consoles because they prefer that experience.
I believe that even if every single console game also got released on PC, it still would not have any major impact on console sales.
The people who do not like playing games on PC or can't afford a powerful enough PC will still continue to buy consoles.
That's why Microsoft and Sony are fighting for console exclusives, but they don't really care much if the game also gets released on PC.
I mean, nowadays yes.
Back when PC wasn't a dumping ground for anything and everything videogame related, the disparity between software offerings was substantial.
Along with ease of use, exclusive titles are the biggest reason consoles still have a place at the table.
Well, why else would you buy a console?
I mean, I play games on my PC every now and then, but I spend most of my gaming time playing on a console or a handheld.
And the first thing I look at before purchasing a system is its current and upcoming exclusive lineup, since I think buying a system out of brand loyalty is silly.
It's not my main exclusive games are stupid />Well, for the Wii U it was, but there really aren't many 3rd party games on it anyways except Bayonetta and Xenoblade Chronicles.
Well, why else would you buy a console?
I mean, I play games on my PC every now and then, but I spend most of my gaming time playing on a console or a handheld.
And the first thing I look at before purchasing a system is its current and upcoming exclusive lineup, since I think buying a system out of brand loyalty is silly.
PC gamers are definitely the most likely to buy consoles for exclusives.
I mainly game on PC and bought an Xbox One for Halo and a PS4 for JRPG's and exclusives I really want like basically anything from Quantic Dream, Uncharted etc.
But I expect most console owners bought one because they just wanted something good to play games on, which is fair enough.
It's the biggest reason to why I bought a WiiU and my xbox one even though I kinda did buy an xbox one because it is technically the cheapest way to play some of the big multiplats that get released in the future for the PS4 and apologise, games where you are animal where one where I live.
The PS4 and xbox one have not really relied on exclusives that much to sell consoles since they released.
Not out of brand loyalty, of course because I think I lean more toward Sony in that regard but because Nintendo have such an astounding first party lineup, their systems are always bound to have at least a handful of great games.
It remains to be seen what they do with the NX though.
I haven't thoroughly enjoyed a Nintendo system since the Gamecube, so I'm hoping they blow my socks off.
Most people just want something they can plug into their TV and play games.
That's about as much thought as they give it, my mates for example are still chugging along with Xbox 360's and have no intension of changing especially with all the dirt cheap games they can get.
Real gamers build PC's ; © 2019 CBS Interactive Inc.

T7766547
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

The Stupidity Test. 9601 plays .. More test games More stupid games Have you developed an HTML5 game? If you’re a developer or publisher and would like to.


Enjoy!
Play Free Online Games | festes.ru®
Valid for casinos
Club Exclusive — Pogo Insider
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
What will happen if they follow MS route and delve into the cross-buy thing?
I wont go to PC because I don't like playing on PC.
I have several, I just have no desire to buy games for them.
I don't care if games are exclusive or multiplat.
That is simply not relevant to me.
I decide which games I like and buy the console that plays them the best or have the preferred features or controller.
It's really quite simple.
People as in people who don't care about internet narratives?
They buy consoles because they are foremost video game playing machines and allow easy access to a new generation of video games.
That's why people buy them.
Well, you do get a console for it´s exclusives, you can only play Halo in Xbox or God of War in PS whatever or some version of Mario in any of the multiple Nintendo systems, once you have acquired the exclusives you want https://festes.ru/are/games-where-you-are-animal.html finally doesn´t matter much what you have playing for example COD in either it´s pretty much the same one or the other.
Nopemost of people who buy consoles are casual gamers and they hardly care about exclusivesthose stupid fanboys who won't quit bashing phil spencer may disagree but they don't represent whole console gaming community as much as I don't represent the whole PC gaming community commonfate: same, out of circle of friends in two cities I've lived in the past 5 years, pc gamers are s minority Eh, I don't really want console exclusives.
Stuff like Uncharted represents the least interesting, least compelling kind of game design for me.
Boring stories, boring gameplay, it's lowest common denominator kind of stuff.
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
Nope, majority buy systems that will have their favorite games and friends on it.
Just look at top selling games and youll find why they buy the system.
Youll notice exclusives wont be high on that list.
Eh, I don't really want console exclusives.
Stuff like Uncharted represents the least interesting, least compelling kind of game design for me.
Boring stories, boring gameplay, it's lowest common denominator kind of stuff.
TC wasn't talking only about SonyNintendo has an archive of great exclusive titles that I'd buy in heartbeat if they come to PC Defintely not.
It's a secondary factor.
My gaming friends made the switch to PC, which is convenient for me.
About everyone, friends and family has a Wii-U even if they barely use it, fortunately it had the added bonuses of games are free all I am somewhat interested in, so that's what I currently own.
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
For me too, since our main platform is PC and we have everything we want.
Well, then ppl should have no problem with exclusives being released on PC yet see how they went nuts over QB and i'm sure the worse would've happened if it was a Sony exclusive.
I don't think so, there is a huge demographic of people who simply just want something to play games on, something relatively cheap, and something that requires little thought to set up.
These are also likely the reason why console games see huge sales but only in very few games.
This huge group that buys a console for 4-5 games a year at most, and of those games there rarely seem to many casinos are there in an exclusive.
Not saying that most people in these forums are that type, I mean since they are in here they care somewhat about games and gaming.
But most people I know that has a console, falls into that category.
Back in earlier generations, I'd say absolutely for me.
I bought my first PS1 specifically because of Bushido Blade, which was never going to come to PC.
Later, I got into FF7, FF8 and a bunch of other fun JRPGs that at the time were console exclusive.
Ever since, I purchased every new console under the assumption that there'd be at least -something- on those platforms that I'd like to play and so far I haven't been disappointed.
That said, if there's a PC version as well that's not released significantly after the console version then I'll go for the PC version every time because I have a beefy PC and unless the PC version is a really bad port it will generally always be better with faster loading times, better frame rates and resolutions, etc.
These days, though, there are more incentives for people to go console.
The online communities I know plenty of people who's purchasing decision was based on that platform all their friends where playing onthe online store features like free games with PSN+ and Xbox Live Gold, etc.
That's assuming that people are even entertaining the idea of getting a gaming PC, which many console owners don't.
Sure, on a gaming forum you'll see a ton of people comparing the merits of each but end of the day tons of console gamers aren't weighing the pros and cons of PC gaming versus consoles, they are thinking "I want to play some cool games.
I exclusive games are stupid believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
For me too, since our main platform is PC and we have everything we want.
Well, then ppl should have no problem with exclusives being released on PC yet see how they went nuts over QB and i'm sure the worse would've happened if it was a Sony exclusive.
Agreed, I don't see what the big deal is.
Some people just hate it when an "opposing faction" gets a game they were getting as an exclusive and throw a hissy fit.
They can't see that MS is trying to support both PC and Xbox.
Something they should've always done.
It's always better for a company to go for multiple markets instead of one.
Anyway, I never cry when PC loses an exclusive.
The more gamers that get to play something, the better.
Only PC gamers buy consoles for exclusives.
Most console gamers are casuals they don't know anything about PC gaming For me?
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the are casino rigged 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
For me too, since our main platform is PC and we have everything we want.
Well, then ppl should have no problem with exclusives being released on PC yet see how they went nuts over QB and i'm sure the worse would've happened if it was a Sony exclusive.
Agreed, I don't see what the big deal is.
Some people just hate it when an "opposing faction" gets a game they were getting as an exclusive and throw a hissy fit.
They can't see that MS is trying to support both PC and Xbox.
Something they should've always done.
It's always better for a company to go for multiple markets instead of one.
Anyway, I never cry when PC loses an exclusive.
The more gamers that get to play something, the better.
Yeah, i've never seen a PC gamer bitching about an exclusive being released on PC.
Back in earlier generations, I'd say absolutely for me.
I bought my first PS1 specifically because of Bushido Blade, which was never going to come to PC.
Later, I got into FF7, FF8 and a bunch of other fun JRPGs that at the time were console exclusive.
Ever since, I purchased every new console under the assumption that there'd be at least -something- on those platforms that I'd like to play and so far I haven't been disappointed.
That said, if there's exclusive games are stupid PC version as well that's not released significantly after the console version then I'll go for the PC version every time because I have a beefy PC and unless the PC version is a really bad port it will generally always be better with faster loading times, better frame rates and resolutions, etc.
These days, though, there are more incentives for people to go console.
The online communities I know plenty of people who's purchasing decision was based on that platform all their friends where playing onthe online store features like free games with PSN+ and Xbox Live Gold, etc.
That's assuming that people are even entertaining the idea of getting a gaming PC, which many console owners don't.
Sure, on a gaming forum you'll see a ton of people comparing the merits of each but end of the day tons of console gamers aren't weighing the pros and cons of PC gaming versus consoles, they are thinking "I want check this out play some cool games.
No one person can answer that for everybody, for me no I don't buy a console just for exclusive games are stupid exclusive but I"m sure some do.
Although, i would like a console to play smash bros, and mario kart with my girlfriend, fifa, and other couch co op games.
Yesh I know you can connect your pc to your living room tv.
Why waste money on rigging a pc when consoles are cheaper and more accessible?
Does it make PC bad?
We're just more comfortable playing on consoles.
Exclusives are the main reason PC gamers buy consoles for sure.
However, I'm pretty sure the majority of console buyers are there for the multiplats, and lack the budget or familiarity for using a gaming PC.
I have several, I just have no desire to buy games for them.
I don't care if games are exclusive or multiplat.
That is simply not relevant to me.
I decide which games I like and buy the console that plays them the best or have the preferred features or controller.
It's really quite simple.
Nopemost of people who buy consoles are casual gamers and they hardly care about exclusivesthose stupid fanboys who won't quit bashing phil spencer may disagree but they don't represent whole console gaming community as much as I don't represent the whole PC gaming community Most ignorant post I've read here today.
I wont go to PC because I don't like playing on PC.
I have several, I just have no desire to buy games for them.
I don't care if games are exclusive or multiplat.
That is simply not relevant to me.
I decide which games I like and buy the console that plays them the best or have the preferred features or controller.
It's really quite simple.
I don't game on consoles because of the exclusives.
I game on consoles because that's how I prefer to play.
I like lying on my bed and looking up at my big screen TV with controller in hand and headphones on.
If Halo started releasing on PC, it wouldn't make me want to start gaming on PC instead.
Nopemost of people who buy consoles are casual gamers and they hardly care about exclusivesthose stupid fanboys who won't quit bashing phil spencer may disagree but they don't represent whole console gaming community as much as I don't represent the whole PC gaming community Most ignorant post I've read here today.
K Yes main reason I went with xbox one was because of its exclusives and console exclusives it has.
If I just did multiplats then I'd probably go with a ps4.
Exclusives are the main reason that existing PC gamers buy consoles, but it is not the reason that most console gamers choose consoles over PC.
Some PC gamers seem to have a hard time accepting this, but the reality is, a lot of people just simply do not like playing games on a PC.
Phil Spencer said it perfectly when he said that people play on consoles because they prefer that experience.
I believe that even if every single console game also got released on PC, it still would not have any major impact on console sales.
The people who do not like playing games on PC or can't afford a powerful enough PC will still continue to buy consoles.
That's why Microsoft and Sony are fighting for console exclusives, but they don't really care much if the game also gets released on PC.
I mean, nowadays yes.
Back when PC wasn't a dumping ground for anything and exclusive games are stupid videogame related, the disparity between software offerings was substantial.
Along with ease of use, exclusive titles are the biggest reason consoles still have a place at the table.
Well, why else would you buy a console?
I mean, I play games on my PC every now and then, but I spend most of my gaming time playing on a console or a handheld.
And the first thing I look at show games that are free to play purchasing a system is its current and upcoming exclusive lineup, since I think buying a system out of brand loyalty is silly.
It's not my main reason.
Well, for the Wii U it was, but there really aren't many 3rd party games on it anyways except Bayonetta and Xenoblade Chronicles.
Well, why else would you buy a console?
I mean, I play games on my PC every now and then, but I spend most of my gaming time playing on a console or a handheld.
And the first thing I look at before purchasing a system is its current and upcoming exclusive lineup, since Exclusive games are stupid think buying a system out of brand loyalty is silly.
PC gamers are definitely the most likely to buy consoles for exclusives.
I mainly game on PC and bought an Xbox One for Halo and a PS4 for JRPG's and exclusives I really want like basically anything from Quantic Dream, Uncharted etc.
But I expect most console owners bought one because they just wanted something good to play games on, which is fair enough.
It's the biggest reason to why I bought a WiiU and my xbox one even though I kinda did buy an xbox one because it is technically the cheapest way to play some of the big multiplats that get released in the future for the PS4 and xbox one where I live.
The PS4 and xbox one have not really relied on exclusives that much to sell consoles since they released.
Not out of brand loyalty, of course because I think I lean more toward Sony in that regard but because Nintendo have such an astounding first party lineup, their systems are always bound to have at least a handful of great games.
It remains to be seen what they do with the NX though.
I haven't thoroughly enjoyed a Nintendo system since the Gamecube, so I'm hoping they blow my socks off.
Most people just want something they can plug into their TV and play games.
That's about as much thought as they give it, my mates for example are still chugging along with Xbox 360's and have no intension of changing especially with all the dirt cheap games they can get.
Real gamers build PC's ; © 2019 CBS Interactive Inc.

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Play Stupid Zombies: Stupid Chickens. An open platform for all web games! Get your games in front of thousands of users while monetizing through ads and virtual goods.


Enjoy!
Are exclusive games the main reason why people buy consoles? - System Wars - GameSpot
Valid for casinos
Club Exclusive — Pogo Insider
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
What will happen if they follow MS route and delve into the cross-buy thing?
casinos that are 18 wont go to PC because I don't like playing on PC.
I have several, I just have no desire to buy games for them.
I don't care if games are exclusive or multiplat.
That is simply not relevant to me.
I decide which games I like and buy the console that plays them the best or have the preferred features or controller.
It's really quite simple.
People as in people who don't care about internet narratives?
They buy consoles because they are foremost video game playing machines and allow easy access to a new generation of video games.
That's why people buy them.
Well, you do get a console for it´s exclusives, you can only play Halo in Xbox or God of War in PS whatever or some version of Mario in any of the multiple Nintendo systems, once you have acquired the exclusives you want it finally doesn´t matter much what you have playing for example COD in either it´s pretty much the same one or the other.
Nopemost of people who buy consoles are casual gamers and they hardly care about exclusivesthose stupid fanboys who won't quit bashing phil spencer may disagree but they don't represent whole console gaming community as much as I don't represent the whole PC gaming community commonfate: same, out of circle of friends in two cities I've lived in the past 5 years, pc gamers are s minority Eh, I don't really want console exclusives.
Stuff like Uncharted represents the least interesting, least compelling kind of game design for me.
Boring stories, boring gameplay, it's lowest common denominator kind of stuff.
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
Nope, majority buy systems that will have their favorite games and friends on it.
Just look at top selling games and youll find why they buy the system.
Youll notice exclusives wont be high on that list.
Eh, I don't really want console exclusives.
Stuff like Uncharted represents the least interesting, least compelling kind of game design for me.
Boring stories, boring gameplay, it's lowest common denominator kind of stuff.
TC wasn't talking only about SonyNintendo has an archive of great exclusive titles that I'd buy in heartbeat if they come to PC Defintely not.
It's a secondary factor.
My gaming friends made the switch to PC, which is convenient for me.
About everyone, friends and family has a Wii-U even if they barely use it, fortunately it had the added bonuses of exclusives Are there any casinos near salt lake city ut am somewhat interested in, so that's what I currently own.
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
For me too, since our main platform is PC and we have everything we want.
Well, then ppl should have no problem with exclusives being released on PC yet see how they went nuts over QB and i'm sure the worse would've happened if it was a Sony exclusive.
I don't think so, there is a huge demographic of people who simply just want something to play games on, something relatively cheap, and something that requires little thought to set up.
These are also exclusive games are stupid the reason why console games see huge sales but only in very few games.
This huge group that buys a console for 4-5 games a year at most, and of those games there rarely seem to be an exclusive.
Not saying that most people in these forums are that type, I mean since they are in here they care somewhat about games and gaming.
But most people I know that has a console, falls into that category.
Back in earlier generations, I'd say absolutely for me.
I bought my first PS1 specifically because of Bushido Blade, which was never going to come to PC.
Later, I got into FF7, FF8 and a bunch of other fun JRPGs that at the time were console exclusive.
Ever since, I purchased every new console under the assumption that exclusive games are stupid be at least -something- on those platforms that I'd like to play and so far I haven't been disappointed.
That said, if there's a PC version as well that's not released significantly after the console version then I'll go for the PC version every time because I have a beefy PC and unless the PC version is a really bad port it will generally always be better with faster loading times, better frame rates and resolutions, etc.
These days, though, there are more incentives for people to go console.
The online communities I know plenty of people who's purchasing decision was based on that platform all their friends where playing onthe online store features like free games with PSN+ and Xbox Live Gold, etc.
That's assuming that people are even entertaining the idea of getting a gaming PC, which many console owners don't.
Sure, on a gaming forum you'll see a ton of people comparing the merits of each but end of the day tons of console gamers aren't weighing the pros and cons of PC gaming versus consoles, they are thinking "I want to play some cool games.
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
For me too, since our main platform is PC and we have everything we want.
Well, then ppl should have no problem with exclusives being released on PC yet see how they went nuts over QB and i'm sure the worse would've happened if it was a Sony exclusive.
Agreed, I don't see what the big deal is.
Some people just hate it when an "opposing faction" gets a game they were getting as an exclusive and throw a hissy fit.
They can't see that MS is trying to support both PC and Xbox.
Something they should've always done.
It's always better for a company to go for multiple markets instead of one.
Anyway, I never cry when PC loses an exclusive.
The more gamers that get to play something, the better.
Only PC gamers buy consoles for exclusives.
Most console gamers are casuals they don't know anything about PC gaming For me?
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
For me too, since our main platform is PC and we have everything we want.
Well, then ppl should have no problem with exclusives being released on PC yet see how they went nuts over QB and i'm sure the worse would've happened if it was a Sony exclusive.
Agreed, I don't see what the big deal is.
Some people just hate it when an "opposing faction" gets a game they were getting as an exclusive and throw a hissy fit.
They can't point. are casino machines rigged pity that MS is trying to support both PC and Xbox.
Something they should've always done.
It's always better for a company to go for multiple markets instead of one.
Anyway, I never cry when PC loses an exclusive.
The more gamers that get to play something, the better.
Yeah, i've never seen a PC gamer bitching about an exclusive being released on PC.
Back in earlier generations, I'd say absolutely for me.
I bought my first PS1 specifically because of Bushido Blade, which was never going to come to PC.
Later, I got into FF7, FF8 and a bunch of other fun JRPGs that at the time were console exclusive.
Ever since, I purchased every new console under the assumption that there'd be at least -something- on those platforms that I'd like to play and so far I haven't been disappointed.
That said, if there's a PC version as well that's not released significantly after the console version then I'll go for the PC version every time because I have a beefy PC and unless the PC version is a really bad port it will generally always be better with faster loading times, better frame rates and resolutions, etc.
These days, though, there are more incentives for people to go console.
The online communities I know plenty of people who's purchasing decision was based on that platform all their friends where playing onthe online store features like free games with PSN+ and Xbox Live Gold, etc.
That's assuming that people are even entertaining the idea of getting a gaming PC, which many console owners don't.
Sure, on a gaming forum you'll see a ton of people comparing the merits of each but end of the day tons of console gamers aren't weighing the pros and cons of PC gaming versus consoles, they are thinking "I want to play some cool games.
No one person can answer that for everybody, for me no I don't buy a console just for it's exclusive but I"m sure some exclusive games are stupid />Although, i would like a console to play smash bros, and mario kart with my girlfriend, fifa, and other couch co op games.
Yesh I know you can connect your pc to your living room tv.
Why waste money on rigging a pc when consoles are cheaper and more accessible?
Does it make PC bad?
We're just more comfortable playing on consoles.
Exclusives are the main reason PC gamers buy consoles for sure.
However, I'm pretty sure the majority of console buyers are there for the multiplats, and lack the budget or familiarity for using a gaming PC.
I have several, I just have no desire to buy games for them.
I don't care if games are exclusive or multiplat.
That is simply not relevant to me.
I decide which games I like and buy the console that plays them the best or have the preferred features or controller.
It's really quite simple.
Nopemost of people who buy consoles are casual gamers and they hardly care about exclusivesthose stupid fanboys who won't quit bashing phil spencer may disagree but they don't represent whole console gaming community as much as I don't represent the whole PC gaming community Most ignorant post I've read here today.
I wont go to PC because I don't like playing how many casinos are there in montreal PC.
I have several, I just have no desire to buy games for them.
I don't care if games are exclusive or multiplat.
That is simply not relevant to me.
I decide which games I like and buy the console that plays them the best or have the preferred features or controller.
It's really quite simple.
I don't game on consoles because of the exclusives.
I game on consoles because that's how I prefer to play.
I like lying on my bed and looking up at my big screen TV with controller in hand and headphones on.
If Halo started releasing on PC, it wouldn't make me want to start gaming on PC instead.
Nopemost of people who buy consoles are casual gamers and they hardly care about exclusives exclusive games are stupid, those stupid fanboys who won't quit bashing phil spencer may disagree but they don't represent whole console gaming community as much as I don't represent the whole PC gaming community Most ignorant post I've read here today.
K Yes main reason I went with xbox one was because of its exclusives and console exclusives it has.
If I just did multiplats then I'd probably go with a ps4.
Exclusives are the main reason that existing PC gamers buy consoles, but it is not the reason that most console gamers choose consoles over PC.
Some PC gamers seem to have a hard time accepting this, but the reality is, a lot of people just simply do not like playing games on a PC.
Phil Spencer said it perfectly when he said that people play on consoles because they prefer that experience.
I believe that even if every single console game also got released on PC, it still would not have any major impact on console sales.
The people who do not like playing games on PC or can't afford a powerful enough PC will still continue to buy consoles.
That's why Microsoft and Sony are fighting for console exclusives, but they don't really care much if the game also gets released on PC.
I mean, nowadays yes.
Back when PC wasn't a dumping ground for anything exclusive games are stupid everything videogame related, the disparity between software offerings was substantial.
Along with ease of use, exclusive titles are the biggest reason consoles still have a place at the table.
Well, why else would you buy a console?
I mean, I play games on my PC every now and then, but I spend most of my gaming time playing on a exclusive games are stupid or a handheld.
And the first thing I look at before purchasing a system is its current and upcoming exclusive lineup, since I think buying a system out of brand loyalty is silly.
It's not my main reason.
Well, for the Wii U it was, but there really aren't many 3rd party games on it anyways except Bayonetta and Xenoblade Chronicles.
Well, why else would you buy a console?
I mean, I play games on my PC every now and then, but I spend most of my gaming time playing on a console or a handheld.
And the first thing I look at before purchasing a system is its current and upcoming exclusive lineup, since I think buying a system out of brand loyalty is silly.
PC gamers are definitely the most likely to buy consoles for exclusives.
I mainly game on PC and bought an Xbox One for Halo and a PS4 for JRPG's and exclusives I really want like basically anything from Quantic Dream, Uncharted etc.
But I expect most console owners bought one because they just wanted something good to play games on, which is fair enough.
It's the biggest reason to why I bought a WiiU and my xbox one even though I kinda did buy an xbox one because it is technically the cheapest way to play some of the big multiplats that get released in the future for the PS4 and xbox one where I live.
The PS4 and xbox one have not really relied on exclusives that much to sell consoles since they released.
Not out of brand loyalty, of course because I think I lean more toward Sony in that regard but because Nintendo have such an astounding first party lineup, their systems are always bound to have at least a handful of great games.
It remains to be seen what they do with the NX though.
I haven't thoroughly enjoyed a Nintendo system since the Gamecube, so I'm hoping they blow my socks off.
Most people just want something they can plug into their More info and play games.
That's about as much thought as they give it, my mates for example are still chugging along with Xbox 360's and have no intension of changing especially with all the dirt cheap games they can get.
Real gamers build PC's ; © 2019 CBS Interactive Inc.

T7766547
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

This is a list of games for the Xbox video game console.. Games. There are a total of 1047 titles on this list. See Lists of video games for other platform lists.. For a chronological list, click the sort button in any of the available regions's column.


Enjoy!
The Check Up #15: Amazon Prime Exclusive Games & How Stupid the Idea is - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Are console exclusives a good thing or a bad thing? : truegaming
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Get all the Gold Membership perks of the Kinda Funny Games Patreon as well! Exclusive access to a monthly Q&A with Kinda Funny; Get The Kinda Funny Gamescast 3 days early and ad-free (Both audio and video) Exclusive access to the Pre- and Post-show of The Kinda Funny Gamescast (Both audio and video) Watch The Kinda Funny Gamescast LIVE as it is.


Enjoy!
Play Free Online Games | festes.ru®
Valid for casinos
The Check Up #15: Amazon Prime Exclusive Games & How Stupid the Idea is - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
WTF!? Amazon 'Prime Exclusive' Video Games!? IS THIS IS A STUPID BUSINESS DECISION?

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

"Exclusives are held hostage" implies all games should be non-exclusive and exclusive games are only exclusive because they are forced to be such. "Exclusives are used to sell systems" implies that they're a tool, perhaps on their own choice or not. So choice of word does matter in this discussion.


Enjoy!
The Check Up #15: Amazon Prime Exclusive Games & How Stupid the Idea is - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Are console exclusives a good thing or a bad thing? : truegaming
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Some Thing Stupid

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

This video is unavailable. Watch Queue Queue


Enjoy!
Play Free Online Games | festes.ru®
Valid for casinos
Sony and Microsoft Need To End Their Idiotic 'Exclusive Content' War
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Tony Yayo Calls Game's Jay-Z Attack A 'Stupid Move' {EXCLUSIVE}

T7766547
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

The PS4/Xbox One Console War Has Taken A Decidedly Stupid Turn.. An eBook From Forbes. Microsoft may be doing a slightly better job of having exclusive games and features, but only barely.


Enjoy!
Club Exclusive — Pogo Insider
Valid for casinos
Sony and Microsoft Need To End Their Idiotic 'Exclusive Content' War
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

T7766547
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

For Star Ocean: The Last Hope on the Xbox 360, a GameFAQs message board topic titled "Stupid Exclusive Games".


Enjoy!
Play Free Online Games | festes.ru®
Valid for casinos
Console Exclusives on PC Meltdown - Fight to Keep PS4/Xbox One Exclusive Games Off PC is STUPID! - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
As I continue to browse the gaming forums on Reddit, I'm seeing a lot of anti-exclusive sentiment going around.
I've heard comments on how they are ruining the gaming experience, are completely arbitrary, etc.
I'm curious as to exclusive games are stupid your opinions are.
As a PS3 owner soon to be PS4 ownerI have been on both sides of the fence.
On one hand, I absolutely love Sony exclusives The Last of Us, Heavy Rain, Beyond, etc.
On the other hand, I absolutely despised how XBOX 360 would always get the Fallout or Skyrim DLC content before PS3 did.
For some games, PS3 support was basically nonexistent.
For those that dislike console exclusives, what's your alternative?
If all platforms have the same games, why buy one over another?
Should the market just be about what platforms have the best hardware and specs?
I'm genuinely curious as to what you think would be better for the gaming market.
I feel like exclusives only exist to hem in consumers and force them to use a specific platform.
I hated xbox360 but I ended up having to support them because they were able to buy up exclusive titles that I wanted to play.
So from that angle I think the best thing for consumers would be able to play any game on the platform of their choice.
Console makers would then have to compete on hardware specs, but also business practices, online player experience, etc.
That said I do think it's easier for developers to make high quality games for a single system, which is one of the reasons exclusives are usually really good games.
Requiring former exclusives to be released on multiple systems would require a lot more developer investment, and would therefore shift even more power to the largest corporate game developers which I also think is a bad thing for consumers.
I think your second paragraph is the most important one in this thread.
However, I must say it is not only developer investment, but more important publisher investment.
Case in point is back on your first paragraph, get exclusives, get consumers.
Developers have concentration on the game, publishers have concentration on the dollar.
I personally think that exclusive have a negative impact on the gaming community, versus the much more noble IMO developer buy-out.
Consider Naughty Dog, or even Thatgamecompany, these have been owned by Sony and have produced some of the highest quality games made in the last generation.
Now while I do agree with your developer scope, as far as porting can create a lot of bugs, I do think that developer exclusives are much more positive than console exclusives.
Add to this the consideration of the positive feedback loop: Exclusive games are usually good because their development is aided by focus and additional resources.
AND This is the case because they HAVE to be good, in order to sell that console or the game, if it's a thirdparty developer.
So what you get is a market-driven force that churns out quality video games.
Which is exactly why I think exclusives are good for gaming in the long term.
They force value, innovation, and creativity into what otherwise might be a bland, homogeneous industry.
Of course, the topic is more nuanced, but that's what I think.
To quote Ben 'yahtzee' Croshaw "At this point, I would only buy a next gen console if it had a game I really really really wanted to play, but it would not be a healthy consumer-product relationship.
It would not be a console providing something I want.
It would be a console holding exclusive games are stupid I want hostage.
The legitimacy of this as a business practice I think it's called vertical integration is up for debate, but it's not unique to video games.
It is unique to art forms, AFAIK.
No book requires that you have a certain model of device, and movies are generally standardized on format.
I guess you're right.
No art-form or past time gates itself from consumers as much as video games do.
For example, some channels you can only get by subscribing to cable.
But we of course see it as entertainment or higher.
How do you think this barrier of entry impacts the quality of the games and the relationship exclusive games are stupid the consumer?
It's almost always a business decision rather than an artistic one, and is intended to lure consumers into walled garden ecosystems like consoles as opposed to relatively open and free platforms like the PC.
Yeah, the walled garden analogy is a good one to employ.
Ok, followup: Are there any positives to be gained from walled gardens?
If so, could the negatives of being trapped inside or excluded from a walled garden be mitigated by the existence of other walled gardens and the freedom of choice to move between them?
I analogise this to an Earth exclusive games are stupid of nation-states.
Do we eliminate borders, or do we preserve states?
The positives I see from walled gardens is that they promote a level of cohesion and quality that is difficult to emulate in completely open systems.
Ok, followup: Are there any positives to be gained from walled gardens?
If so, could the negatives of being trapped inside or excluded from a walled garden be mitigated by the existence of other walled gardens and the freedom of choice to move between them?
Absolutely, but the problem is that it's the platform itself that is walled rather than a walled garden resting on the platform.
Juxtapose the open nature of something like the PC with its relatively walled off application Steam - Steam might be dominate, but there's at least the possibility of competition.
Consoles have no such benefit.
I also have unrelated concerns about any computing device where you don't "own" the software, let alone the hardware.
But my ultimate concern is the way these walled and closed systems affect the art rather than exclusive games are stupid consumer.
The major concerns are reproducing these games later for the benefit of future generations, sacrificing artistic integrity in favor of catering to a platform holder, and generally limiting the ability of audiences to engage with works on their own terms.
There's also the fact that top-down console exclusives have a bad history of being insignificant in advancing the medium.
Note that I'm not including bottom-up exclusives, such as Journey, some of which are brilliant, but rather the "system seller" games which are largely made to show off graphical features and appeal to a narrow early adopter demographic - neither learn more here which are likely to result in a work with timeless value.
Sorry that those thoughts are so scattered.
I see the platform as the wall.
A Nintendo platform is a walled garden of exclusives made specifically with the platform in mind.
The reason I see value in this is because the platform is itself an integral piece of the art.
Games are designed symbiotically with the hardware, which is why you can get something like Skyward Sword or Metroid Prime to play like it does.
The open nature of the PC is great in that it caters to the greatest diversity of games but offers nothing except power and a mouse to the gameplay experience.
If you say it offers something, then there is no difference between it and a console, and if you say it doesn't, then there is a wasted artistic opportunity to contribute to creative and online game show jeopardy contestants are tested gameplay that furthers the medium.
DRM is a separate issue and I wholly agree with your opinions on it.
I'll speak to top-down innovation in the next comment.
In my mind, top-down exclusives are the obvious source for advancing the medium.
I can think of game saves coming from the original Zelda, thumbsticks coming from Super Mario 64, 3D targetting systems coming from Ocarina of Time, and motion controls debate over significance learn more here coming from the Wii.
Bottom-up advancement comes from the most open systems when they are broad enough to support new ideas.
The PC is great for that because it has a global system of information processing and storage at its disposal.
Open systems are fertile ground for new ideas, closed systems are directed and have a goal in mind.
Which is why you have significant advancements in gaming from launch titles that do something new with hardware made specifically for that purpose.
The downside is, you are then excluding that which doesn't conform to your hardware.
And it is precisely that risky trade-off that requires exclusives to be ground-breaking.
If they aren't, the system has shot itself in the foot.
I love that this subreddit allows you to say things like you hate the Xbox 360 and you didn't even start a fanboy showdown.
Truth be told it's nice that a developer gets to put more work into a game that's designed specifically for a system, but it depresses me when I see so many cool Xbox one exclusives and I know that I can't play any on PS4.
As has been said, they're necessary for marketing, but with the way gaming is today then I can't recall the last time an exclusive was the best game in a generation.
Mario 64 vs Spyro, Mario Kart vs Crash Team Racing, Ocarina of Time and Goldeneye vs.
I guess Nintendo had a pretty clear win there.
Now, the exclusive is far from dead, and we've had loads of great exclusives from all sides in the last generation, but the console lineups becoming more similar is just allowing the PC to differentiate itself more again.
When exclusive games are stupid the last time you saw an RTS or 4X game on a console?
The PC has whole GENRES as exclusives.
I agree with your broader point, just a few quibbles.
Super Mario Galaxy, Last of Us, Journey, etc.
Commercially, I think your assessment is correct, but only in the last few years.
Mario Kart is still a monster seller.
PC having unique genres is not unique.
The Wii has unique genres too, or it did, until Microsoft and Sony took on motion gaming too.
Pikmin is a great console RTS.
What's a 4X game?
Edit: I've looked it up, 4X games are games where you e xplore, e xpand, e xploit, and e xterminate strategically.
Basically, empire building games like Civilization.
I see no reason why they couldn't be done on a console.
Nintendo is somewhat of an exception as a lot of their IP is either a unique genre or the best in the genre.
Leads nicely into my next point that I wouldn't really call pikmin an RTS, not in the way that starcraft is.
Also, a 4x game is something like civilisation or crusader kings.
It's a grand strategy about empire management, normally turn based and a lot of them have been set in space.
Yeah, it's probably quite arbitrary how we define genres.
I realise that Pikmin would be on a far end of the RTS bell curve, but it's still probably the best genre designation for it.
Bingo Battle mode even more so.
I would've called 4X games just a strategy game before today.
It's distinct and well enough defined, I guess, to merit its own genre title.
The 4X's do actually stand for something.
Not entirely sure what but it's along the lines of eXplore, eXpand, blah blah marketing team just got a raise.
Graphics power is ome example, but this mostly relates to more fundamental differences.
Imagine a game that use the kinect heavily.
The PS4 has a camera, but it's no kinect.
It might not be possible to do the same things with both systems.
Or imagine trying to port a Wii U game to the PS4.
How would you even do that?
And should we include portable consoles?
I mean, they're consoles too, why should some games be exclusive to non-portable systems?
Consider a Japanese developer who's deciding what systems to develop for.
The Playstation 3 is source a given since the game will need a powerful machine, but what about the 360?
Well, the 360 didn't sell well in Japan, and the game might not sell well in America, so it's unlikely that any funds you devote to making a 360 version could be made back.
This is probably going to be less true this generation since the architectures are pretty similar, but it was true last generation.
The 360 was simply easier to design for.
I'll admit it does seem a little silly that you can only play certain games on certain systems.
You don't see that with anything else.
You can play Sony DVDs just fine in a Panasonic player, but video games are different enough to warrant different behavior.
I expect that there will be less exclusives this generation since the architectures of both systems are similar, but we'll see.
My prediction for exclusives exclusive games are stupid generation is a decrease in the quantity and an increase in the quality.
Since PS4 and XB1 are so similar, we'll see fewer exclusive titles, but the exclusive titles we do see will have to meet new standards set by the best exclusive games of the last generation.
The similarity of the systems has absolutely nothing to do with how many exclusives will be released, 3rd parties already don't release exclusives unless they're paid to and 1st party aren't going to start to release games on their competitors systems because it's easy to port.
If anything we'll see more exclusives because that's what moves units and companies will invest more in them.
Your point about third parties not going exclusive unless paid is absolutely false.
Game development is incredibly complex and there are far more factors at play than money.
Developers do have console preferences.
here what are the best slots to play online apologise sounds obvious, but it plays a large role in development.
For example, while Epic Games develops for a number of platforms, they admire the Xbox enough to make Gears of War specifically for that system.
Developing a game for two consoles is difficult.
Again, this sounds obvious, but all the time and resources spent on a port for another console may not pay off, especially in terms of international markets.
Many PS3 exclusives, for instance, are big sellers in Japan, and probably wouldn't sell well in North America, which reinforces their exclusivity.
There's the nature of the consoles themselves.
Multi-platform releases may not be advisable for some games.
Take Ubisoft's Rayman Raving Rabbids, for example, which was designed with Wii in mind but also released on 360.
The general consensus is that the 360 version is inferior because it's missing the mayhem and mania of motion controls.
More recently, we see this phenomena on Wii U, which is such an eclectic system that it's almost designed for exclusives only.
Then there's the matter of "getting it right," a sentiment voiced recently by Respawn Entertainment, designers of upcoming TITANFALL, who opted to develop solely for the Xbox One and not the PlayStation 4.
Early in a console's life cycle, choosing one system or the other is much easier on developers, since it takes years for cross-platform tools to be developed.
Centering on XBO and not PS4 lets them make fuller use of the console and produce a better game than if they had to divide their time and resources localizing the game to two systems simultaneously.
I could go on, but you get the picture.
Critical discussion about specific games, features, and topics is encouraged.
We understand that it can be difficult to disengage from the aggressor, but we heavily suggest reporting the post and avoiding further interaction with the poster.
Please report rule breaking behaviour.

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

games for girls, princess games, dressup games for girls, games for kids, princess dressup, disney games, free games, girl games, baby games, enjoydressup, enjoy dress up, enjoy dressup, dress up, dress up games for girls, dressupgames, dress up games fashion, dress up games new, dress up games 2017, dress up mix, enjoy dress up games, dress up shop, dressup bar, games girl dressup, games girl.


Enjoy!
Are console exclusives a good thing or a bad thing? : truegaming
Valid for casinos
Are exclusive games the main reason why people buy consoles? - System Wars - GameSpot
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
As I continue to browse the gaming forums on Reddit, I'm seeing a lot of anti-exclusive sentiment going around.
I've heard comments on how they click here ruining the https://festes.ru/are/what-are-the-best-free-rpg-games-for-android.html experience, are completely arbitrary, etc.
I'm curious as to what your opinions are.
As a PS3 owner soon to be PS4 ownerI have been on both sides of the fence.
On one hand, I absolutely love Sony exclusives The Last of Us, Heavy Rain, Beyond, etc.
On the other hand, I absolutely despised how XBOX 360 would all games are free get the Fallout or Skyrim DLC content before PS3 did.
For some games, PS3 support was basically nonexistent.
For those that dislike console exclusives, what's your alternative?
If all platforms have the same games, why buy one over another?
Should the market just be about what platforms have the best hardware and specs?
I'm genuinely curious as to what you think would be better for the gaming market.
I feel like exclusives only exist to hem in consumers and force them to use a specific platform.
I hated xbox360 but I ended up having to support them because they were able to buy up exclusive titles that I wanted to play.
So from that angle I think the best thing for consumers would be able to play any game on the platform of their choice.
Console makers would then have to compete on hardware specs, but also business practices, online player experience, etc.
That said I do think it's easier for developers to make high quality games for a single system, which is one of the reasons exclusives are usually really good games.
Requiring former exclusives to be released on multiple systems would require a lot more developer investment, and would therefore shift even more power to the largest corporate game developers which I also think is a bad thing for consumers.
I think your second paragraph is the most important one in this thread.
However, I must say it is not only developer investment, but more important publisher learn more here />Case in point is back on your first paragraph, get exclusives, get consumers.
Developers blackjack are online and free multiplayer concentration on the game, publishers have concentration on the dollar.
I personally think that exclusive have a negative impact on the gaming community, versus the much more noble IMO developer buy-out.
Consider Naughty Dog, or even Thatgamecompany, these have been owned by Sony and have produced some of the highest quality games made in the last generation.
Now while I do agree with your developer scope, as far as porting can create a lot of bugs, I do think that developer exclusives are much more positive than console exclusives.
Add to this the consideration of the positive feedback loop: Exclusive games are usually good because their development is aided by focus and additional resources.
AND This is the case because they HAVE to be good, in order to sell that console or the game, if it's a thirdparty developer.
So what you get is a market-driven force that churns out quality video games.
Which is exactly why I think exclusives are good for gaming in the long term.
They force value, innovation, and creativity into what otherwise might be a bland, homogeneous industry.
Of course, the topic is more nuanced, but that's what I think.
To quote Ben 'yahtzee' Croshaw "At this point, I would only buy a next gen console if it had a game I really really really wanted to play, but it would not be a healthy consumer-product relationship.
It would not be a console providing something I want.
It would be a console holding something I want hostage.
The legitimacy of this as a business practice I think it's called vertical integration is up for debate, but it's not unique to video games.
It is unique to art forms, AFAIK.
No book requires that you have a certain model of device, and movies are generally standardized on format.
I guess you're right.
No art-form or past time gates itself from consumers as much as video games do.
For example, some channels you can only get by subscribing to cable.
But we of course see it as entertainment or higher.
How do you think this barrier of entry impacts the quality of the games and the relationship with the consumer?
It's almost always a business decision rather than an artistic one, and is intended to lure consumers into walled garden ecosystems like consoles as opposed to relatively open and free platforms like the PC.
Yeah, the walled garden analogy is a good one to employ.
Ok, followup: Are there any positives to be gained from walled gardens?
If so, could the negatives of being trapped inside or excluded from a walled garden be mitigated by the existence of other walled gardens and the freedom of choice to move between them?
I analogise this to an Earth full of nation-states.
Do we eliminate borders, or do we preserve states?
The positives I see from walled gardens is that they promote a level of cohesion and quality that is difficult to emulate in completely open systems.
Ok, followup: Are there any positives to be gained from walled gardens?
If so, could the negatives of being trapped inside or excluded from a walled garden be mitigated by the existence of other walled gardens and the freedom of choice to move between them?
Absolutely, but the problem is that it's the platform itself that is walled rather than a walled garden resting on the platform.
Juxtapose the open nature of something like the PC with its relatively walled off application Steam - Steam might be dominate, but there's at least the possibility of competition.
Consoles have no such benefit.
I also have unrelated concerns about any computing device where you don't "own" the software, let alone the hardware.
But my ultimate concern is the exclusive games are stupid these walled and closed systems affect the art rather than the consumer.
The major concerns are reproducing these games later for the benefit of future generations, sacrificing artistic integrity in favor of catering to a platform holder, and generally limiting the ability of audiences to engage with works on their own terms.
There's also the fact that top-down console exclusives have a bad history of being insignificant in advancing the medium.
Note that I'm not including bottom-up exclusives, such as Journey, some of which are brilliant, but rather the "system seller" games which are largely made to show off graphical features and appeal to a narrow early adopter demographic - neither of which are likely to result in a work with timeless value.
Sorry that those thoughts are so scattered.
I see the platform as the wall.
A Nintendo platform is a walled garden of exclusives made specifically with the platform in mind.
The reason I see value in this is because the platform is itself an integral piece of the art.
Games are designed symbiotically with the hardware, which is why you can get something like Skyward Sword or Metroid Prime to play like it does.
The open nature of the PC is great in that it caters to the greatest diversity of games but offers nothing except power and a mouse to the gameplay experience.
If you say it offers something, then there is no difference between it and a console, and if you exclusive games are stupid it doesn't, then there is a wasted artistic opportunity to contribute to creative and innovative gameplay that furthers the medium.
DRM is a separate issue and I wholly agree with your opinions on it.
I'll speak to top-down innovation in the next comment.
In my mind, top-down exclusives are the obvious source for advancing the medium.
I can think of game saves coming from the original Zelda, thumbsticks coming from Super Mario 64, 3D targetting systems coming from Ocarina of Time, and motion controls debate over significance aside coming from the Wii.
Bottom-up advancement comes from the most open systems when they are broad enough to support new ideas.
The PC is great for that because it has a global system of information processing and storage at its disposal.
Open systems are fertile ground for new ideas, closed systems are directed and have a goal in mind.
Which is why you have significant advancements in gaming from launch titles that do something new with hardware made specifically for that purpose.
The downside is, you are then excluding that which doesn't conform to your hardware.
And it is precisely that risky trade-off that requires exclusives to be ground-breaking.
If they casinos that are 18, the system has shot itself in the foot.
I love that this subreddit allows you to say things like you hate the Xbox 360 and you didn't even start a fanboy showdown.
Truth be told it's nice that a developer gets to put more work into a game that's designed specifically for a system, but it depresses me when I see so many cool Xbox one exclusives and I know that I can't play any on PS4.
As has been said, they're necessary for marketing, but with the way gaming is today then I can't recall the last time an exclusive was the best game in a generation.
Mario 64 vs Spyro, Mario Kart vs Crash Team Racing, Ocarina of Time and Goldeneye vs.
I guess Nintendo had a pretty clear win there.
Now, the exclusive is far from dead, and we've had loads of great exclusives from all sides in the last generation, but the console lineups becoming more similar is just allowing the PC to differentiate itself more again.
When was the last time you saw an RTS or 4X game on a console?
The PC has whole GENRES as exclusives.
I agree with your broader point, just a few quibbles.
Super Mario Galaxy, Last of Us, Journey, etc.
Commercially, I think your assessment is correct, but only in the last few years.
Mario Kart is still a monster seller.
PC having unique genres is not unique.
The Wii has unique genres too, or it did, until Microsoft and Sony took on motion gaming too.
Pikmin is a great console RTS.
What's a 4X game?
Edit: I've looked it up, 4X games are games where you e xplore, e xpand, e xploit, and e xterminate strategically.
Basically, empire building games like Civilization.
I see no reason why they just click for source be done on a console.
Nintendo is somewhat of an exception as a lot of their IP is either a unique genre or the best in the genre.
Leads nicely into my next point that I wouldn't really call pikmin an RTS, not in the way that starcraft is.
Also, a 4x game is something like civilisation or crusader kings.
It's a grand strategy about empire management, normally turn based and a lot of them have been set in space.
Yeah, it's probably quite arbitrary how we define genres.
I realise that Pikmin would be on a far end of the RTS bell curve, but it's still probably the best genre designation for it.
Bingo Battle mode even more so.
I would've called 4X games just a strategy game before today.
It's distinct and well enough defined, I guess, to merit its own genre title.
The 4X's do actually stand for something.
Not entirely sure what but it's along the lines of eXplore, eXpand, blah blah marketing team just got a raise.
Graphics power is ome example, but this mostly relates to more fundamental differences.
Imagine a game that use the kinect heavily.
The PS4 has a camera, but it's no kinect.
It might not be possible to do the same things with both systems.
Or imagine trying to port a Wii U game to the PS4.
How would you even do that?
And should we include portable consoles?
I mean, they're consoles too, why should some games be exclusive to non-portable systems?
Consider a Japanese developer who's deciding what systems to develop for.
The Playstation 3 is probably a given since the game will need a powerful machine, but what about the 360?
Well, the 360 didn't sell well in Japan, and the game might not sell well in America, so it's unlikely that any funds you devote to making a 360 version could be made back.
This is probably going to be less true this generation since the architectures are pretty similar, but it was true last generation.
The 360 was simply easier to design for.
I'll admit it does seem a little silly that you can only play certain games on certain systems.
You don't see that with anything else.
You can play Sony DVDs just fine in a Panasonic player, but video games are different enough to warrant different behavior.
I expect that there will be less exclusives this generation since the architectures of both systems are similar, but we'll see.
My exclusive games are stupid for exclusives this generation is a decrease in the quantity and an increase in the quality.
Since PS4 and XB1 are so similar, we'll see fewer exclusive titles, but the exclusive titles we do see will have to meet new standards set by the best exclusive games of the last generation.
The similarity of the systems has absolutely nothing to do with how many exclusives will be released, 3rd parties already don't release exclusives unless they're paid to and 1st party aren't going to start to release games on their competitors systems because it's easy to port.
If anything we'll see more exclusives because that's what moves units and companies will invest more in them.
Your point about third parties not going exclusive unless paid is absolutely false.
Game development is incredibly complex and there are far more factors at play than money.
Developers do have console preferences.
This sounds obvious, but it plays a large role in development.
For example, while Epic Games develops for a number of platforms, they admire the Xbox enough to make Gears of War specifically for that system.
Developing a game for two consoles is difficult.
Again, this sounds obvious, but all the time and resources spent on a port for another console may not pay off, especially in terms of international markets.
Many PS3 exclusives, for instance, are big sellers in Japan, and probably wouldn't sell well in North America, which reinforces their exclusivity.
There's the nature of the consoles themselves.
Multi-platform releases may not be advisable for some games.
Take Ubisoft's Rayman Raving Rabbids, for example, which was designed with Wii in mind but also released on 360.
The general consensus is that the 360 version is inferior because it's missing the mayhem and mania of motion controls.
More recently, we see this phenomena on Wii U, which is such an eclectic system that it's almost designed for exclusives only.
Then there's the matter of "getting it right," a sentiment voiced recently by Respawn Entertainment, designers of upcoming TITANFALL, who opted to develop solely for the Xbox One and not the PlayStation 4.
Early in a console's life cycle, choosing one system or the other is much easier on developers, since it takes years for cross-platform tools to be developed.
Centering on XBO and not PS4 lets them make fuller use of the console and produce a better game than if they had to divide their time and resources localizing the game to two systems simultaneously.
I could go on, but exclusive games are stupid get the picture.
Critical discussion about specific games, features, and topics is encouraged.
We understand that it can necessary where are the casinos in tahoe important difficult to disengage from the aggressor, but we heavily suggest reporting the post and avoiding further interaction which casinos best in vegas the poster.
Please report rule breaking behaviour.

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Stupid Game: The Idiot Test. Try to prove you're not an idiot by following basic directions.


Enjoy!
Are console exclusives a good thing or a bad thing? : truegaming
Valid for casinos
Club Exclusive — Pogo Insider
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
The Check Up #15: Amazon Prime Exclusive Games & How Stupid the Idea is

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Games industry analyst Michael Pachter suggests that console exclusive games don't matter like they used to and that exclusives aren't why people buy the PS4.


Enjoy!
Are exclusive games the main reason why people buy consoles? - System Wars - GameSpot
Valid for casinos
Console Exclusives on PC Meltdown - Fight to Keep PS4/Xbox One Exclusive Games Off PC is STUPID! - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
EPIC JUST DID SOMETHING ABSOLUTELY STUPID

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Games industry analyst Michael Pachter suggests that console exclusive games don't matter like they used to and that exclusives aren't why people buy the PS4.


Enjoy!
Are exclusive games the main reason why people buy consoles? - System Wars - GameSpot
Valid for casinos
Are exclusive games the main reason why people buy consoles? - System Wars - GameSpot
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
What will happen if they follow MS route and delve into the cross-buy thing?
I wont go to PC because I don't like playing on PC.
I have several, I just have no desire to buy games for them.
I don't care if games are exclusive or multiplat.
That is simply not relevant to me.
I decide which games I like and buy the console that plays them the best or have the preferred features or controller.
It's really quite simple.
People as in people who don't care about internet narratives?
They buy consoles because they are foremost video game playing machines and allow easy access to a new generation of video games.
That's click at this page people buy them.
Well, you do get a console for it´s exclusives, you can only play Halo in Xbox or God of War in PS whatever or some version of Mario in any of the multiple Nintendo systems, once you have acquired the exclusives you want it finally doesn´t matter much what you have playing for example COD in either it´s pretty much the same one or the other.
Nopemost of people who buy consoles are casual gamers and they hardly care about exclusivesthose stupid fanboys who won't quit bashing phil spencer may disagree but they don't represent whole console gaming community as much as I don't represent the whole PC gaming community commonfate: same, out of circle of friends in two cities I've lived in the past 5 years, pc gamers are s minority Eh, I don't really want console exclusives.
Stuff like Uncharted represents the least interesting, least compelling kind of game design for me.
Boring stories, boring gameplay, it's lowest common denominator kind exclusive games are stupid stuff.
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
Nope, majority buy systems that will have their favorite games and friends on it.
Just look at top selling games and youll find why they buy the system.
Youll notice exclusives wont be high on that list.
Eh, I don't really want console exclusives.
Stuff like Uncharted represents the least interesting, least compelling kind of game design for me.
Boring stories, boring gameplay, it's lowest common denominator kind of stuff.
TC wasn't talking only about SonyNintendo has an archive of great exclusive titles that I'd buy in heartbeat if they come to PC Defintely not.
It's a secondary factor.
My gaming friends made the switch to PC, which is source for me.
About everyone, friends and family has a Wii-U even if they barely use it, fortunately it had the added bonuses of exclusives I am somewhat interested in, so that's what I currently own.
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
For me too, since our main platform is PC and we have everything we want.
Well, then ppl should have no problem with exclusives being released on PC yet see how they went nuts over QB and i'm sure the worse would've happened if it was a Sony exclusive.
I don't think so, there is a huge demographic of people who simply just want something to play games on, something relatively cheap, and something that requires little thought to set up.
These are also likely the reason why console games see huge sales but only in very few games.
This huge group that buys a console for 4-5 games a year at most, and of those games there rarely seem to be an exclusive.
Not saying that most people in these forums are that type, I mean since they are in here they care somewhat about games and gaming.
But most people I know that has a console, falls into that category.
Back in earlier generations, I'd say absolutely for me.
I bought my first PS1 specifically because of Bushido Blade, which was never going to come to PC.
Later, I got into FF7, FF8 and a bunch of other fun JRPGs that at the time were console exclusive.
Ever since, I purchased every new console under the assumption that there'd be at least -something- on those platforms that I'd like to play and so far I haven't been disappointed.
That said, if there's a PC version as well that's not released significantly after the console version then I'll go for the PC version every time because I have a beefy PC and unless the PC version is a really bad port it will generally always be better with faster loading times, better frame rates and resolutions, etc.
These days, though, there are more incentives for people to go console.
The online communities I know plenty of people who's purchasing decision was based on that platform all their friends where playing onthe online store features like free games with PSN+ and Xbox Live Gold, etc.
That's assuming that people are even entertaining the idea of getting a gaming PC, which many console owners don't.
Sure, on a gaming forum you'll see a ton of people comparing the merits of each but end of the day tons of console gamers aren't weighing the pros and cons of PC gaming versus consoles, they are thinking "I want to play some cool games.
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
For me too, since our main platform is PC and we have everything we want.
Well, then ppl should have no problem with exclusives being released on PC yet see how they went nuts over QB and i'm sure the worse would've happened if it was a Sony exclusive games are stupid />Agreed, I don't see what the big deal is.
Some people just hate it when an "opposing faction" gets a game they were getting as an exclusive and throw a hissy fit.
They can't see that MS is trying to support both PC and Xbox.
Something they should've always done.
It's always better for a company to go for multiple markets instead of one.
Anyway, I never cry when PC loses an exclusive.
The more gamers that get to play something, the better.
Only PC gamers buy consoles for exclusives.
Most console gamers are casuals they don't know anything about PC gaming For me?
I don't believe so.
At the end of 360s lifetime it seemed to sell fine without exclusives.
PS4 has been selling like crazy for the past 2 years and it doesn't have many exclusives worth noting.
For me too, since our main platform is PC and we have everything we want.
Well, then ppl should have no problem with exclusives being released on PC yet see how they went nuts over QB and i'm sure the worse would've happened if it was a Sony exclusive.
Agreed, I don't see what the big deal is.
Some people just hate it when an "opposing faction" gets a game they were getting as an exclusive and throw a hissy fit.
They can't see that MS is trying to support both PC and Xbox.
Something they should've always done.
It's always better for a company to go for multiple markets instead of one.
Anyway, I never cry when PC loses an exclusive.
The more gamers that get to play something, the better.
Yeah, i've never seen a PC gamer bitching about an exclusive being released on PC.
Back in earlier generations, I'd say absolutely for me.
I bought my first PS1 specifically because of Bushido Blade, which was never going to come to PC.
Later, I got into FF7, FF8 and a bunch of other fun JRPGs that at the time were console exclusive.
Ever since, I purchased every new console under the assumption that there'd be at least -something- on those platforms that I'd like to play and so far I haven't been disappointed.
That said, if there's a PC version as well that's not released significantly after the console version then I'll go for the PC version every time because I have a beefy PC and unless the PC version is a really bad port it will generally always be better with faster loading times, better frame rates and resolutions, etc.
These days, though, there are more incentives for people to go console.
The online communities I know plenty of people who's purchasing decision was based on that platform learn more here their friends where playing onthe online store features like free games with PSN+ and Xbox Live Gold, etc.
That's assuming that people are even entertaining the idea of getting a gaming PC, which many console owners don't.
Sure, on a gaming forum you'll see a ton of people comparing the merits of each but end of the day tons of console gamers aren't weighing the pros and cons of PC gaming versus consoles, they are thinking "I want to play some cool games.
No one person can answer that for everybody, for me no I don't buy a console just for it's exclusive but I"m sure some do.
Although, i would like a console to play smash bros, and mario kart with my girlfriend, fifa, and other couch co op games.
Yesh I know you can connect your pc to your living room tv.
Why waste money on rigging a pc when consoles are cheaper and more accessible?
Does it make PC bad?
We're just more comfortable playing on consoles.
Exclusives are the main reason PC gamers buy consoles for sure.
However, I'm pretty sure the majority of console buyers are there for the multiplats, and lack the budget or familiarity for using a gaming PC.
I have several, I just have no desire to buy games for them.
I don't care if games are exclusive or multiplat.
That is simply not relevant to me.
I decide which games I like and buy the console that plays them the best or have exclusive games are stupid preferred features or controller.
It's really quite simple.
Nopemost of people who buy consoles are casual gamers and they hardly care about exclusivesthose stupid fanboys who won't quit bashing phil spencer may disagree but they don't represent whole console gaming community as much as I don't represent the whole PC gaming community Most ignorant post I've read here today.
I wont go to PC because I don't like playing on PC.
I have several, I just have no desire to buy games for them.
I don't care if games are exclusive or multiplat.
That is simply not relevant to me.
I decide which games I like and buy the console that plays them the best or have the preferred features or controller.
It's really quite simple.
I don't game on consoles because of the exclusives.
I game on consoles because that's how I prefer to play.
I like lying on my bed and looking up at my big screen TV with controller in hand and headphones on.
If Halo started releasing on PC, it wouldn't make me want to start gaming on PC instead.
Nopemost of people who buy consoles are casual gamers and they hardly care about exclusivesthose stupid fanboys who won't quit bashing phil spencer may disagree but they don't represent whole console gaming community as much as I don't represent the whole PC gaming community Most ignorant post I've read here today.
K Yes main reason I went with xbox one was because of its exclusives and console exclusives it has.
If I just did multiplats then I'd probably go with a ps4.
Exclusives are the main reason that existing PC gamers buy consoles, but it is not the reason that most console gamers choose consoles over PC.
Some PC gamers seem to have a hard time accepting this, but the reality is, a lot of people just simply do not like playing games on a PC.
Phil Spencer said it perfectly when he said that people play on consoles because they prefer that experience.
I believe that even if every single console game also got released on PC, it still would not have any major impact on console sales.
The people who do not like playing games on PC or can't afford a powerful enough PC will still continue to buy consoles.
That's why Microsoft and Sony are fighting for console exclusives, but they don't really care much if the game also gets released on PC.
I mean, nowadays yes.
Back when PC wasn't a dumping ground for anything and everything videogame related, the disparity between software offerings was substantial.
Along with ease of use, exclusive titles are the biggest reason consoles still have a place at the table.
Well, why else would you buy a console?
I mean, I play games on my PC every now and then, but I spend most of my gaming exclusive games are stupid playing on a console or a handheld.
And exclusive games are stupid first thing I look at before purchasing a system is its current and upcoming exclusive lineup, since I think buying a system out of brand loyalty is silly.
It's not my main reason.
Well, for the Wii U it was, but there really aren't many 3rd party games on it anyways except Bayonetta and Xenoblade Chronicles.
Well, why else would you buy a console?
I mean, I play games on my PC every now and then, but I spend most of my gaming time playing on a console or a handheld.
there free mbr slots on disk the first thing I look at before purchasing a system is its current and upcoming exclusive lineup, since I think buying a system out of brand loyalty is silly.
PC gamers are definitely the most likely to buy consoles for exclusives.
I mainly game on PC and bought an Xbox One for Halo and a PS4 for JRPG's and exclusives I really want like basically anything from Quantic Dream, Uncharted etc.
But I expect most console owners bought one because they just wanted something good to play games on, which is fair enough.
It's the biggest reason to why I bought a WiiU and my xbox one even though I kinda did buy an xbox one because it is technically the cheapest way to play some of the big multiplats that get released in the future for the PS4 and xbox one where I live.
The PS4 and xbox one have not really relied on exclusives that much to sell consoles since they released.
Not out of brand loyalty, of course because I think I lean more toward Sony in that regard but because Nintendo have such an astounding first party lineup, their systems are always bound to have at least a handful of great games.
It remains to be seen what they do with the NX though.
I haven't thoroughly enjoyed a Nintendo system since the Gamecube, so I'm hoping they blow my socks off.
Most people just want something they can plug into their TV and play games.
That's about as much thought as they give it, my mates for example are still chugging along with Xbox 360's and have no intension of changing especially with all the dirt cheap games they can get.
Real gamers build PC's ; © 2019 CBS Interactive Inc.

TT6335644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Free games to play online at MIStupid.com. Stupid Games. Free games to play online.


Enjoy!
Are console exclusives a good thing or a bad thing? : truegaming
Valid for casinos
Are exclusive games the main reason why people buy consoles? - System Wars - GameSpot
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

if its multiplat then its for my PC. there are a few exceptions (WRC and the recent rayman games +child of light for my vita) but overall i only buy a game on a console if the game is exclusive.


Enjoy!
Club Exclusive — Pogo Insider
Valid for casinos
Are exclusive games the main reason why people buy consoles? - System Wars - GameSpot
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Stupid Games are games that are crazy, absurd, silly, dumb, weird and sometimes even disgusting. Yeah, that is what the world's most stupid games like. It can be a funny graphics and characters that make it so stupid or the concept of the game itself.


Enjoy!
Club Exclusive — Pogo Insider
Valid for casinos
Club Exclusive — Pogo Insider
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Since the Switch came out, Nintendo has managed to maintain a solid ratio of good games on their system. At this point there’s a healthy selection of fantastic Switch games to choose from.


Enjoy!
Console Exclusives on PC Meltdown - Fight to Keep PS4/Xbox One Exclusive Games Off PC is STUPID! - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Play Free Online Games | festes.ru®
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Game of Thrones Prequel has a Really Stupid Title!

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Stupid Game: The Idiot Test. Try to prove you're not an idiot by following basic directions.


Enjoy!
Console Exclusives on PC Meltdown - Fight to Keep PS4/Xbox One Exclusive Games Off PC is STUPID! - YouTube
Valid for casinos
The Check Up #15: Amazon Prime Exclusive Games & How Stupid the Idea is - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments